I completely agree with Kayla and Julia that proportional gerrymandering
is the best route to take. The House was made to be the piece of government
closest to the people. In order for the House to represent people’s views,
their views should be proportionally represented. The shortest split-line
method can sometimes cause the representation to be off. If there is way to
ensure that the proportional representation could be accurate every time then
why wouldn’t we use it? If someone is being paid to purposely gerrymander then
they wouldn’t risk their salary to toy with the process. They could always have
more jobs in place after the person finishes looking over the job and making
sure it fulfills
all the requirements it was asked to fill. This process can
also make court cases regarding gerrymandering disappear because since it’s a
purposeful act no one can argue with it. Even if there are weirdly shaped
states, everyone would be informed of it in the first place and know the reason
why, If someone is politically interested enough to look up the shape of their
House district then by that time I’m sure they would be informed of the new
system out in place. In the article it said that gerrymandering has grown to
becoming easier with computer systems and such. Those systems could also potentially
help this process too. Also, this solution should make people the most happy.
People are now guaranteed that their state, and their wants and needs are
accurately represented. Now if CT wants one republican district that encompasses
all of the republicans in the state because their population is little then they
would finally get a voice unlike now where if you are a republican living in CT
you literally have no voice whatsoever because all of our House reps are
democratic unlike with the split-line where they could still split up the
districts equally and have republicans split up everywhere. This would give
them no voice still. Proportional gerrymandering ensures representation no matter
where you may reside in the state.
"People are now guaranteed that their state, and their wants and needs are accurately represented."...love the CT example. Could this help to create political polarization both in Congress and in our political culture?
ReplyDelete