After reading “The Power Elite” by C. Wright Mills I am now
even more convinced than I already was after reading Wilson’s Theory of
Governance in class today that the Elitist theory is not is not how America’s
Democracy is controlled today. I completely agree with Kayla and Hannah that
the hyperpluralist theory is much more effective in classifying how America
currently operates. Mills writes that “Religious, educational and family
institutions are not autonomous centers of national power.” He in turn believes
that “-the warlord, the corporation chieftains, the political directorate- tend
to come together, to form the power elite of America.” While I cannot deny the
fact that those three elites to have a considerable effect on law making and
what not, I think that there is many other groups and people that contribute to
this just as much. A great example that is also included in the article
attached below is that there has been many laws set in place like minimum wage
and food and safety inspections. If corporations and the wealthy held all of
the power, how would that get passed? It’s also unreasonable to say that
religious, educational and family institutions aren’t nearly as powerful as the
“Elites” he considers so mighty. There are many interest groups involving all
of those things that tend to be the most successful because those three topics
are what hits home to many people and causes strong feelings. When people feel
strongly about specific topics they tend not to let those go and that’s one way
how hyperpluralism, which states contradictory policies result from trying to
please everyone, happens. Another perfect example of this is all of the
campaign finance laws we just spent a week studying. All of those laws kept
changing and over lapping; one overruling another. For example, the public
voiced their concerns about political campaign finance therefore policy was
made to please the country as a whole. Then corporations influenced the
Citizens United case which in tern created a confusing mass of over riding laws.
I’m not saying that everyone has an equal voice because that would be
ridiculous, but there are various groups like the wealthy, corporations, famous
people, interest groups and voters as a whole that come together and effect the
policy and laws created in this country. To categorize the Elites as only three
types of people is the equivalent to categorizing the world into three types of
people. It just simply can’t be done. Here is a short article that includes an
outside opinion that I think simply states exactly how I feel: Opinions On the Three Theories
I agree that hyperpluralism is the correct interest group theory for America today. All of the previous court cases that we studied on campaign finance are perfect examples of hyperpluralism. Each court case seemed to result in a law that counteracted the ruling of the previous case. The end result was no solution to a huge problem that needed to be fixed. It's fair to say that our democracy has been weakened by interest groups, because politicians no longer care about the people as a whole but the people they have to pay off for getting them this far, even when they pass a law for the majority people it's not because it's the right thing to do, but it will secure their support. This leads into the Elite Theory because now the elites are the only ones making decisions. It's possible that neither the Elite theory nor hyperpluralism is correct, but it' a combination of both. Overall I agree that hyperpluralism is a major contributor to America today and would explain the constant gridlock we are in.
ReplyDeleteExactly! Regarding campaign finance, just even looking at the mind map would make your head spin. And now after looking at the open secrets website showing all the unions backing up parties that have average citizens in them and after watching the videos of people in one small town in california beating the elites who wanted the road for their own purposes, it really proves the elite theory wrong.
ReplyDelete